TTRT Picks
← Blog
GuidesAnalysis5 min read

A clinic wrote to correct us. They were right.

By Alexandru Vieru · Updated · Independently researched & fact-checked

A clinic wrote to correct us. They were right.

Summarize this page with

On 18 September 2026 someone from Fountain TRT wrote to tell us our review of them was wrong. They were right, and the reason is worse than a wrong number.

We had been reviewing Fountain off a domain the company stopped maintaining — since the commit that created this site.

What we published, and for how long

fountaintrt.com looks like the obvious address for a clinic called Fountain TRT. It resolves. It serves a real page, over HTTPS, with a real price on it. It is also a legacy page the company still hosts but no longer updates. The maintained site is fountain.net.

We published three different descriptions of this clinic. Two of them were wrong.

fromwhat we saidreality
2026-06-04injectable onlyfountaintrt.com has never sold injectables — this matched neither domain
2026-08-28cream only, needle-free, $199/mo flat, all 50 statesread off the legacy page
2026-09-18injections, cream and enclomiphene; three prices per 4 weeks; 25 statesthe current site

The first description is the one that should worry you most, and it is ours alone. It was not a misreading of the wrong site. On that field there was no site behind it at all — the seed entry carried treatments: ["injectabil"] with the note "Doar injectabil", and neither Fountain domain has ever matched that.

Everything that was wrong

Not just the modality:

Its score moved 7.5 → 7.8 and its rank #13 → #7 once the evidence was corrected. The score was allowed to land where the corrected evidence put it. It was not aimed.

Why none of our checks caught it

This is the part worth publishing.

This site runs a weekly price verifier. It had been returning success every week. It was reading a real, live page that returned HTTP 200 with a real $199 on it. Nothing 404'd. Nothing redirected. No gate failed.

Every check we own asks whether the number matches the page. Not one asks whether the page is still the right page. A stale-domain failure passes all of them, silently, forever. It had done so since 4 June.

Two further defects surfaced only because the clinic wrote:

  1. "All 50 states + DC" was being asserted for 15 of 20 clinics whenever we had no state data — turning missing information into a positive nationwide availability claim, in the visible table and in the machine-readable schema. Absence now reads as absence.
  2. Every review page claimed HSA/FSA eligibility for all 20 clinics, identically, verified for none of them. Fountain asked us to drop it or verify it. We could not verify it for them, which meant we could not verify it for anyone. It is gone.

Neither of those was Fountain's problem. One clinic's letter found them.

Where we did not simply take their word

We treated the letter as a set of claims to check, not as instructions.

Fountain told us fountaintrt.com "is not them". Their own Terms of Use on fountain.net name fountain.net, fountaintrt.com and fountainglp.com as the three websites of Fountain Vitality, Inc. We now read the current domain exclusively — which is the outcome they asked for — but we do not record the two as unrelated companies, because the clinic's own legal page says they are the same one.

They also told us the current site lists 50 states. It does not. We fetched every page with caching defeated and rendered the FAQ in a real browser with the accordions expanded: the strings "50 states", "District of Columbia" and "DC" do not appear anywhere on the site. The published list is 25.

They then replied with their state list in full. We compared it name by name against what we had corrected our data to: 25 against 25, exact match.

What is still open

The register is worth nothing if it only records the parts we resolved:

Why this is on the site rather than in a changelog

A ranking is a claim that we did the work. The only way that claim means anything is if we publish the times we did not.

We were wrong about Fountain for 106 days, across a review page, 38 comparison URLs, the homepage table, the cost calculators and the quiz. A reader who chose a clinic on our page during that window got a worse answer than they should have, and no amount of process description makes that untrue.

What we can say is what changed: the domain is corrected, the two defects it exposed are fixed for every clinic, and this entry names what is still unresolved rather than closing it because the letter was answered.


Our full error record is on the changelog. Every price on this site carries the date we read it and the page we read it from.

Educational information only, not medical advice. Some links are affiliate links; commissions never affect our scores. Consult a licensed clinician.

Alexandru Vieru · Founder & Editor

Alexandru Vieru is the founder and editor of TRT Picks. He independently researches and verifies every clinic's pricing, treatment options and policies, and maintains the 5-point scoring model used across the site. He is not a licensed medical professional — every clinical claim is sourced to a primary reference (FDA, manufacturer pages, or peer-reviewed studies), and nothing here is medical advice.

Keep reading

Top-rated clinics

Male Excel

8.1

from $99/mo

1st Optimal

8.1

from $169/mo

DudeMeds

8.0

from $77/mo